Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Creation History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 44: Line 44:
 
**[[Theistic_Evolution|Theistic Evolution]]
 
**[[Theistic_Evolution|Theistic Evolution]]
 
**[[Young_Earth_organizations|Young Earth]]
 
**[[Young_Earth_organizations|Young Earth]]
***[[Young_Earth_United States|United States organizations]]
+
***[[Young_Earth_United_States_organizations|United States organizations]]
 
*[[Periodical|Periodicals]]
 
*[[Periodical|Periodicals]]
 
*[[Resources|Resources]]
 
*[[Resources|Resources]]

Revision as of 10:36, 26 June 2018

Creation History Projects

Recent Creation-Evolution Headlines


Today's Date: May 3, 2024

Archive: Neptune, Molecular Motors, Romance

These entries from May 2002, lost during a website upgrade, are reposted here for edification, amusement, or both.
2024-05-03 12:00:00 David F. Coppedge

Endosymbiosis Under the Microscope

Do microbes get married and become one? Is this an example of evolution?
2024-05-02 12:00:59 David F. Coppedge

Species Diversification Still an Evolutionary Puzzle

A look at another failed attempt by evolutionists to explain the origin of species.
2024-05-01 21:14:30 Jerry Bergman

Darwin’s Blunder Lives On

A major journal publishes a paper claiming that natural selection is like human engineering.
2024-04-30 18:45:11 David F. Coppedge

Calling It Evolution When It’s Not

Evolutionists' favorite word gets dragged into situations that don't involve speciation.
2024-04-29 21:29:15 David F. Coppedge

Another Fish Story That Is True

You'll be amazed at the power of a salmon's homing instinct in this short video.
2024-04-27 17:20:57 David F. Coppedge


Since August 2000, Creation-Evolution Headlines has brought breaking news and “color commentary” to the origins debate. Unlike most science reporting sites, CEH is not slavishly devoted to defending Charles Darwin’s views, but critically examines the evidence and the underlying assumptions of evolutionism, pointing out logical and philosophical fallacies the other science news sites routinely ignore, and praising good science that gets it right. Our opinions (in green) are set apart from the news (in black), so that readers can examine the evidence and the original sources for themselves. Critical thinking–so sadly lacking in science reporting–is what we promote, and what you will find here. Creation-Evolution Headlines is sponsored by Master Plan Association, a California non-profit.