Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Creation History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|width="55%" bgcolor="#faf6ed" style="border:1px solid #fad67d;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 
|width="55%" bgcolor="#faf6ed" style="border:1px solid #fad67d;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 
<h2 style="margin:0;background-color:#efe0ca;font-size:160%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #a3bfb1;text-align:center;color:#000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Creation History Projects</h2>
 
<h2 style="margin:0;background-color:#efe0ca;font-size:160%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #a3bfb1;text-align:center;color:#000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Creation History Projects</h2>
{{Div col}}
+
 
 +
 
 +
 
 
*[[Quotes|Audio and Video Quotes]]
 
*[[Quotes|Audio and Video Quotes]]
 
*[[Bibliography|Bibliographies of Creationists]]
 
*[[Bibliography|Bibliographies of Creationists]]
 
**[[William_Bell_Riley|William Bell Riley, 1861-1947.]]
 
**[[William_Bell_Riley|William Bell Riley, 1861-1947.]]
 +
**[[Arthur_I._Brown|Arthur I. Brown, 1875-1947.]]
 +
**[[Harry_Rimmer|Harry Rimmer, 1890–1952.]]
 
**[[George_McCready_Price|George McCready Price, 1870–1963.]]
 
**[[George_McCready_Price|George McCready Price, 1870–1963.]]
 
**[[Harold_W._Clark|Harold W. Clark, 1891-1986.]]
 
**[[Harold_W._Clark|Harold W. Clark, 1891-1986.]]
**[[Arthur_I._Brown|Arthur I. Brown, 1897-1947.]]
+
**[[Frank_Lewis_Marsh|Frank Lewis Marsh, 1899–1992.]]
 
**[[Henry_M._Morris|Henry M. Morris, 1918-2006.]]
 
**[[Henry_M._Morris|Henry M. Morris, 1918-2006.]]
 
**[[Duane_T._Gish|Duane T. Gish, 1921-2013.]]
 
**[[Duane_T._Gish|Duane T. Gish, 1921-2013.]]
Line 44: Line 48:
 
*[[Resources|Resources]]
 
*[[Resources|Resources]]
 
*[[Theses_and_Dissertations|Theses and Dissertations]]
 
*[[Theses_and_Dissertations|Theses and Dissertations]]
{{div col end}}
 
  
 
|width="40%" bgcolor="#f5faff" style="border:1px solid #cedff2;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 
|width="40%" bgcolor="#f5faff" style="border:1px solid #cedff2;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 
<h2 style="margin:0;background-color:#cedff2;font-size:160%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #a3bfb1;text-align:center;color:#000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Recent Creation-Evolution Headlines</h2>
 
<h2 style="margin:0;background-color:#cedff2;font-size:160%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #a3bfb1;text-align:center;color:#000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Recent Creation-Evolution Headlines</h2>
 
<br /><div>'''Today's Date:''' ''{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}''</div>
 
<br /><div>'''Today's Date:''' ''{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}''</div>
 
+
<rss max=6 highlight="Creation-Evolution Headlines">https://crev.info/feed/</rss><div style="font-size:85%">Since August 2000, [http://crev.info/ Creation-Evolution Headlines] has brought breaking news and “color commentary” to the origins debate. Unlike most science reporting sites, CEH is not slavishly devoted to defending Charles Darwin’s views, but critically examines the evidence and the underlying assumptions of evolutionism, pointing out logical and philosophical fallacies the other science news sites routinely ignore, and praising good science that gets it right. Our opinions (in green) are set apart from the news (in black), so that readers can examine the evidence and the original sources for themselves. Critical thinking–so sadly lacking in science reporting–is what we promote, and what you will find here. Creation-Evolution Headlines is sponsored by Master Plan Association, a California non-profit.</div>
<rss max=6 highlight="Creation-Evolution Headlines">http://crev.info/feed/</rss>
 
Since August 2000, [http://crev.info/ Creation-Evolution Headlines] has brought breaking news and “color commentary” to the origins debate. Unlike most science reporting sites, CEH is not slavishly devoted to defending Charles Darwin’s views, but critically examines the evidence and the underlying assumptions of evolutionism, pointing out logical and philosophical fallacies the other science news sites routinely ignore, and praising good science that gets it right. And we do it with flair! Readers enjoy the incisive wit and penetrating analysis in our reporting. Hey! why not have a little fun when the mainstream media are fawning over Emperor Charlie parading around in his new clothes. Our opinions (in green) are set apart from the news (in black), so that readers can examine the evidence and the original sources for themselves. Critical thinking–so sadly lacking in science reporting–is what we promote, and what you will find here. Creation-Evolution Headlines is sponsored by Master Plan Association, a California non-profit
 

Revision as of 13:23, 20 July 2017

Creation History Projects


Recent Creation-Evolution Headlines


Today's Date: May 9, 2024

Bursa: Not a Vestigial Organ

A seemingly useless tissue was often surgically removed until it was found to be very important.
2024-05-08 18:19:44 Jerry Bergman

Is Terminal Lucidity a Window Into the Soul?

Patients with dementia sometimes "come back" briefly into lucid conversation. How is that possible?
2024-05-08 05:29:48 David F. Coppedge

Lay Science Reporters Perpetuate Evolutionary Myths

Myths are homologous by common descent of mutations in logic. Or is that by design?
2024-05-06 19:23:54 David F. Coppedge

Archive: Neptune, Molecular Motors, Romance

These entries from May 2002, lost during a website upgrade, are reposted here for edification, amusement, or both.
2024-05-03 12:00:00 David F. Coppedge

Endosymbiosis Under the Microscope

Do microbes get married and become one? Is this an example of evolution?
2024-05-02 12:00:59 David F. Coppedge

Species Diversification Still an Evolutionary Puzzle

A look at another failed attempt by evolutionists to explain the origin of species.
2024-05-01 21:14:30 Jerry Bergman


Since August 2000, Creation-Evolution Headlines has brought breaking news and “color commentary” to the origins debate. Unlike most science reporting sites, CEH is not slavishly devoted to defending Charles Darwin’s views, but critically examines the evidence and the underlying assumptions of evolutionism, pointing out logical and philosophical fallacies the other science news sites routinely ignore, and praising good science that gets it right. Our opinions (in green) are set apart from the news (in black), so that readers can examine the evidence and the original sources for themselves. Critical thinking–so sadly lacking in science reporting–is what we promote, and what you will find here. Creation-Evolution Headlines is sponsored by Master Plan Association, a California non-profit.