Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
From Creation History Wiki
m |
m |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
<h2 style="margin:0;background-color:#cedff2;font-size:160%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #a3bfb1;text-align:center;color:#000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Recent Creation-Evolution Headlines</h2> | <h2 style="margin:0;background-color:#cedff2;font-size:160%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #a3bfb1;text-align:center;color:#000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Recent Creation-Evolution Headlines</h2> | ||
<br /><div>'''Today's Date:''' ''{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}''</div> | <br /><div>'''Today's Date:''' ''{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}''</div> | ||
− | <rss max=6 highlight="Creation-Evolution Headlines">http://crev.info/feed/</rss><div style="font-size:85%">Since August 2000, [http://crev.info/ Creation-Evolution Headlines] has brought breaking news and “color commentary” to the origins debate. Unlike most science reporting sites, CEH is not slavishly devoted to defending Charles Darwin’s views, but critically examines the evidence and the underlying assumptions of evolutionism, pointing out logical and philosophical fallacies the other science news sites routinely ignore, and praising good science that gets it right | + | <rss max=6 highlight="Creation-Evolution Headlines">http://crev.info/feed/</rss><div style="font-size:85%">Since August 2000, [http://crev.info/ Creation-Evolution Headlines] has brought breaking news and “color commentary” to the origins debate. Unlike most science reporting sites, CEH is not slavishly devoted to defending Charles Darwin’s views, but critically examines the evidence and the underlying assumptions of evolutionism, pointing out logical and philosophical fallacies the other science news sites routinely ignore, and praising good science that gets it right. Our opinions (in green) are set apart from the news (in black), so that readers can examine the evidence and the original sources for themselves. Critical thinking–so sadly lacking in science reporting–is what we promote, and what you will find here. Creation-Evolution Headlines is sponsored by Master Plan Association, a California non-profit.</div> |
Revision as of 18:48, 29 November 2016
Creation History Projects
|
Recent Creation-Evolution HeadlinesToday's Date: April 27, 2024
Archive: First Land Animals, Lateral Gene Transfer, and Beetle Fans
How Could a Camera Eye Evolve in a Worm?
Jupiter’s Volcanic Moon Defies Deep Time
Magical Thinking by Evolutionists
Archive: Caveman Rock, Body Time, Primate with Dinosaurs
Since August 2000, Creation-Evolution Headlines has brought breaking news and “color commentary” to the origins debate. Unlike most science reporting sites, CEH is not slavishly devoted to defending Charles Darwin’s views, but critically examines the evidence and the underlying assumptions of evolutionism, pointing out logical and philosophical fallacies the other science news sites routinely ignore, and praising good science that gets it right. Our opinions (in green) are set apart from the news (in black), so that readers can examine the evidence and the original sources for themselves. Critical thinking–so sadly lacking in science reporting–is what we promote, and what you will find here. Creation-Evolution Headlines is sponsored by Master Plan Association, a California non-profit.
|