Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Creation History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Creation History Projects ==
+
<div id="main_page"></div>
 +
{| cellspacing="3"
 +
|- valign="top"
 +
|width="55%" bgcolor="#faf6ed" style="border:1px solid #fad67d;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 +
<h2 style="margin:0;background-color:#efe0ca;font-size:160%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #a3bfb1;text-align:center;color:#000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Creation History Projects</h2>
  
{{Div col}}
 
 
*[[Quotes|Audio and Video Quotes]]
 
*[[Quotes|Audio and Video Quotes]]
 
*[[Bibliography|Bibliographies of Creationists]]
 
*[[Bibliography|Bibliographies of Creationists]]
Line 34: Line 37:
 
**[[Intelligent_Design_Movement|Intelligent Design]]
 
**[[Intelligent_Design_Movement|Intelligent Design]]
 
**[[Islamic|Islamic]]
 
**[[Islamic|Islamic]]
**[[Noah's_Ark_Organizations|Noah's Ark Organizations]]
+
**[[Noah's_Ark_Organizations|Noah's Ark]]
 
**[[Old_Earth|Old Earth]]
 
**[[Old_Earth|Old Earth]]
 
**[[Theistic_Evolution|Theistic Evolution]]
 
**[[Theistic_Evolution|Theistic Evolution]]
Line 41: Line 44:
 
*[[Resources|Resources]]
 
*[[Resources|Resources]]
 
*[[Theses_and_Dissertations|Theses and Dissertations]]
 
*[[Theses_and_Dissertations|Theses and Dissertations]]
{{div col end}}
+
 
 +
 
 +
|width="40%" bgcolor="#f5faff" style="border:1px solid #cedff2;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
 +
<h2 style="margin:0;background-color:#cedff2;font-size:160%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #a3bfb1;text-align:center;color:#000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Recent Creation-Evolution Headlines</h2>
 +
<br /><div>'''Today's Date:''' ''{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}''</div>
 +
<rss max=6 highlight="Creation-Evolution Headlines">http://crev.info/feed/</rss><div style="font-size:85%">Since August 2000, [http://crev.info/ Creation-Evolution Headlines] has brought breaking news and “color commentary” to the origins debate. Unlike most science reporting sites, CEH is not slavishly devoted to defending Charles Darwin’s views, but critically examines the evidence and the underlying assumptions of evolutionism, pointing out logical and philosophical fallacies the other science news sites routinely ignore, and praising good science that gets it right. Our opinions (in green) are set apart from the news (in black), so that readers can examine the evidence and the original sources for themselves. Critical thinking–so sadly lacking in science reporting–is what we promote, and what you will find here. Creation-Evolution Headlines is sponsored by Master Plan Association, a California non-profit.</div>

Revision as of 18:49, 29 November 2016

Creation History Projects


Recent Creation-Evolution Headlines


Today's Date: April 30, 2024

Darwin’s Blunder Lives On

A major journal publishes a paper claiming that natural selection is like human engineering.
2024-04-30 18:45:11 David F. Coppedge

Calling It Evolution When It’s Not

Evolutionists' favorite word gets dragged into situations that don't involve speciation.
2024-04-29 21:29:15 David F. Coppedge

Another Fish Story That Is True

You'll be amazed at the power of a salmon's homing instinct in this short video.
2024-04-27 17:20:57 David F. Coppedge

Archive: First Land Animals, Lateral Gene Transfer, and Beetle Fans

Enjoy some of our posts from 22 years ago, which were lost during a website upgrade.
2024-04-26 12:00:11 David F. Coppedge

The Science of Being Wrong

In a process of continual correction, when does one get to certainty?
2024-04-25 12:00:06 David F. Coppedge

How Could a Camera Eye Evolve in a Worm?

The story of three annelid branches: Why evolutionists claim they took very different paths.
2024-04-24 12:00:57 Jerry Bergman


Since August 2000, Creation-Evolution Headlines has brought breaking news and “color commentary” to the origins debate. Unlike most science reporting sites, CEH is not slavishly devoted to defending Charles Darwin’s views, but critically examines the evidence and the underlying assumptions of evolutionism, pointing out logical and philosophical fallacies the other science news sites routinely ignore, and praising good science that gets it right. Our opinions (in green) are set apart from the news (in black), so that readers can examine the evidence and the original sources for themselves. Critical thinking–so sadly lacking in science reporting–is what we promote, and what you will find here. Creation-Evolution Headlines is sponsored by Master Plan Association, a California non-profit.