Difference between revisions of "Grand Canyon book controversy"

From Creation History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 130: Line 130:
  
 
* September 12. [http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/default.htm No Answers in Genesis], Australia. [http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/bibliolatry_revisited_elders.htm Bibliolatry Revisited: A Review of "Grand Canyon: a Different View"] by Wilfred A. Elders.
 
* September 12. [http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/default.htm No Answers in Genesis], Australia. [http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/bibliolatry_revisited_elders.htm Bibliolatry Revisited: A Review of "Grand Canyon: a Different View"] by Wilfred A. Elders.
 +
 +
 +
 +
== See Also ==
 +
 +
* [[News archive]]
 +
* [[Ark Encounter news]]
 +
* [[Creation Museum news]]
 +
* [[Creation Museum Date Night controversy]]
 +
* [[Freshwater vs Mount Vernon Middle Schoo]]
 +
* [[Gaskell vs University of Kentucky]]

Revision as of 13:21, 3 March 2011

2009

2008

2007

2006

  • December 28. PEER.org - Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, Washington, DC. USA. Jeff Ruch letter demanding explanation from NPS over "Grand Canyon: A Different View' controversy.

2005

2004

  • April. Harper's Magazine, USA. God rocks! Excerpts from the book.
  • January 27. Albuquerque Tribune, Albuquerque, NM. USA. Grand Canyon Book Stirs Formation Feud by Sue Vorenberg.
  • January 20. American Daily, Phoenix, AZ. USA. High Tech Protest On Grand Canyon Book Controversy by Jeremy Reynalds.
  • January 16. Dallas Morning News, Dallas, TX. USA. There's a great divide over Grand Canyon's age: Scientific groups express concern about book that says a biblical flood created the landmark from Religious News Service.
  • January 12. Arizona Republic, Phoenix, AZ. USA. Shaving years off Grand Canyon by Richard Ruelas.
  • January 7. Arizona Republic, Phoenix, AZ. USA. Biblical flood created Grand Canyon, book says by Julie Cart, Los Angeles Times

2003


See Also