Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Creation History Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 44: Line 44:
 
**[[Theistic_Evolution|Theistic Evolution]]
 
**[[Theistic_Evolution|Theistic Evolution]]
 
**[[Young_Earth_organizations|Young Earth]]
 
**[[Young_Earth_organizations|Young Earth]]
***[[Young_Earth_United States|United States organizations]]
+
***[[Young_Earth_United_States_organizations|United States organizations]]
 
*[[Periodical|Periodicals]]
 
*[[Periodical|Periodicals]]
 
*[[Resources|Resources]]
 
*[[Resources|Resources]]

Revision as of 10:36, 26 June 2018

Creation History Projects

Recent Creation-Evolution Headlines


Today's Date: March 28, 2024

More Ignorance About Bird Flight Admitted

Fifty years of speculation has offered no solution to how birds fly.
2024-03-28 12:00:32 David F. Coppedge

Does Chernobyl Disprove Genetic Entropy?

A study on roundworms thriving in the forbidden zone does not falsify the genetic entropy hypothesis.
2024-03-27 12:00:19 Jerry Bergman

Rethink of Genetics Supports ID over Darwinism

Out with junk DNA. Out with the Central Dogma. Make way for design thinking.
2024-03-26 12:00:45 David F. Coppedge

Darwin Was a Loser Before He Was Recast as a Legend

The Myth was not the man. A new book shows this in Darwin's own words.
2024-03-25 12:00:43 David F. Coppedge

Archive: Wood, Gratitude, and Space Aliens

These stories from 2003 are still fun to read after 21 years. Note: some links may no longer work. How a Plant Would Evolve Wood if It Could   03/25/2003 Lignin is the molecule that gives sturdin...
2024-03-22 12:00:26 David F. Coppedge

Origin of Bird Flight: Pick Your Miracles

Powered flight in birds arose only once; no! it arose many times!
2024-03-21 21:01:32 David F. Coppedge


Since August 2000, Creation-Evolution Headlines has brought breaking news and “color commentary” to the origins debate. Unlike most science reporting sites, CEH is not slavishly devoted to defending Charles Darwin’s views, but critically examines the evidence and the underlying assumptions of evolutionism, pointing out logical and philosophical fallacies the other science news sites routinely ignore, and praising good science that gets it right. Our opinions (in green) are set apart from the news (in black), so that readers can examine the evidence and the original sources for themselves. Critical thinking–so sadly lacking in science reporting–is what we promote, and what you will find here. Creation-Evolution Headlines is sponsored by Master Plan Association, a California non-profit.